Our methodology of evaluating and selecting stock market investment opportunities consists of two elements. Primarily, we perform a complete Financial Ratio Analysis to determine a company's overall financial health. The subtle point of Warren Buffet's statement, 'it is better to find a great company at a fair value, than a fair company at a great value' is often missed by investors who attempt to find undervalued companies regardless of their financial health. The Financial Ratio Analysis sets out to find the best suitable investment opportunities.
A strategic score is determined by the financial ratio analysis. The analysis is based on 4 segments: Liquidity, Debt, Profitability and Cash Flow ratios.
The second element is determining Economic Value Added, often referred to as economic profit. The EVA is the most successful performance metric used by investors. The EVA or economic profit represents the portion of capital surplus after a capital charge is subtracted.
Economic Value Added (EVA) is a better performance metric because it accounts for a capital charge against its capital returns. EVA measures pure economic profit. EVA is calculated by a finding company’s return on invested capital (ROIC) minus its WACC multiplied by the Invested Capital, (ROIC-WACC*IC). We use NOPAT (Net operating profits after adjustments for taxes) as the return metric which we divide by the Invested Capital
Economic profit can also be calculated in percentage form, usually expressed as a ‘return spread’. The return spread is simply the ROIC minus the WACC in percentage. When this return spread is positive, it means the company is generating surplus returns above the cost of capital and that translates into higher intrinsic Market Value Added (MVA) The MVA is defined as the company's current Market Cap minus its invested capital; Another inferred measurement of MVA is the present value of the discounted EVA. The MVA is then found by dividing the discounted EVA by the company’s WAAC less a constant growth rate. (MVA= EVA/WACC-Growth Rate). The fair base value of a company can be determined by first adding the MVA to the company’s Invested Capital and then dividing this total by its outstanding shares. (MVA+IC)/ Out Shares.
Until a business returns a profit that is greater than its cost of capital, it operates at a loss and it is said not to create wealth but to destroy it. Investors should look for positive return spreads, as well as companies that show consistent or growing spreads or EVA. Positive EVA is obtained when return on invested capital exceeds the cost of capital. Investors should look for return spreads greater than 3 times the current 10 years Risk-Free Government Bond Rate.
To define value, investors should distinguish between performance metrics and observational metrics. A performance metric refers to a measure of value under company control. An observational metric, also sometimes called a wealth metric, shows the Market's forward-looking, discounted opinion of company value. As an example, EPS is a performance metric and the P/E multiple its corresponding observational metric. The variables that determine EPS are affected by the company's decisions and actions. On the other hand, the P/E multiple is determined by the company's stock price based on the Market's opinion of implied value. Consequently a company may influence the P/E ratio but cannot fully control it.
The strategic score compiled for the company is based only on Performance metrics. Each individual element is counted, and the overall score is the result of the total value of all elements. A strategic score of 75% is preferred. The Return Spread requirement is 3 times the current risk-free Government 10 year bond rate. When both these two requirements are met, a company is assigned an 'A' rating and it is considered an investable company. Further analysis is required to find the optimal price entry point, based on ROIs, dividend, peer, book and growth values.
Company Rating is established by combining the Strategic Score and the Return Spread. Ratings can range from A to D, indicating Strong Buy, Potential Buy, Hold and Sell. Ratings are compiled on a quarterly basis following Company Quarterly results:
Higher than 75% Higher than 3 x Risk Free Rate A
Higher than 75% Less than 3 x Risk Free Rate B
Between 65% and 75% Higher than 3 x Risk Free Rate B
Between 65% and 75% Less than 3 x Risk Free Rate C
Between 45% and 65% Higher than 3 x Risk Free Rate C
Between 45% and 65% Less than 3 x Risk Free Rate D
Below 45% Any rate D
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Thanks TLassen, can you post the strategic score and return spreads for Microsoft, Apple, or Dell. Cheers
ReplyDeleteGeorge,
ReplyDeleteMSFT
Strategic Score 90%.
(Liguidity and Cash Flow Ratio 100%, Debt and Proftability 80%)
Return spread:17.4%. (ROIC 24.9- WACC 7.5)
Rating A
EVA Base Value $ 20.96 (not to worry, Tech stock are usual considerably lower)
Peer Value $31.74
Grwoth Value: 30.41
Dividend Value $17.33 (MSFT not a great div play )
Book Value: $31.52
Cash Flow Value $28.52.
To solve for 5 year CAGR of 10% (based on current EPS $1.60, Analysts exp growth rate 11.14%, discounted at 7.5%), optimal purchase price: $24.36
5 year est EPS is $ 2.71 or 5 year Fair Value at $36.20
George, you may have to wait for awhile to get MSFT at 24.26. LOL.
will post AAPL and DELL in a few days
hope this helps
Hello TLassen,
ReplyDeleteI stumbled upon your comments on seeking alpha,
I am interested in investing some hard earned money into stocks.
Can you please recommend me some good stocks.
-David
Hello David,
ReplyDeletewithout knowing your details, such as your asset class diversification and your objectives, it would be wrong for me to give you direct recommendations. If you have any particular companies in mind, I would gladly provide you with their financial ratios and some suggested fair values. Hope you understand it is unethical, not to say illegal, for me to tell you to invest in specific companies without knowing more of your particular investment goals and strategies.
Regards TLassen
Hello TLassen,
ReplyDeleteThanks for considering my request.
Here are some of my details,
Investment target about 100K, interms of diversification and asset allocation to be frank I have no clue.
I wanted to start with stocks and have been watching the following companies(symbols)
MOS, POT, AGU, TLAB, VZ, TRA, OTEX, CSCO, S.
Any suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Regards
-David
Ok David, will get back to you by Saturday at the latest with some numbers.
ReplyDeleteIt appears you have 4 'basic material' agricultural companies (MOS, POT, AGU and TRA) so by diversification I imply that you should be careful not to buy more than 1 of these companies. Generally speaking, try to diversify your equity purchases among various sectors; at this period of the economic cycle (basic materials, tech, energy and industrials are good sectors to be in)
By asset class allocation I suggest to 'not put all your eggs in one basket' by buying some stocks, some bonds, some real assets and hold lots of cash. The exact asset class allocation can vary of course from investor to investor. As a general rule holding no more than 50% combined between stocks and real asset classes is recommended while keeping the other 50% in cash or bonds or other 'safer' investments.
Another comment, we are long on POT, CSCO and VZ, but as I said I will get back to you with the overall ratings, real economic profit and the fair value ranges for the above companies, to help you make some informed decisions.
Talk later, TLassen
S (Sprint) Negative economic profit for the last 10 years. Company shows no profits and poor cash flows ratios. Debt and liquidity ratios are acceptable. Financial Ratio Analysis ranks S as 'D' (lowest ranking) the company destroys its investment capital at an average annual rate of 10%. Can not obtain a fair value range because of the negative economic value added. Stay away :)
ReplyDeleteCSCO (we are long on Cisco)Bought in at 16.59 February 1oth 2009
ReplyDeleteOverall good financial ratios (profitability little low) but ranks as a 'B'. Company returns only 2% EVA which is its return on invested capital minus its cost of capital. That's not much, (generally I recommend companies higher than 10%) but it has been consistently in this range since 2003. Fair value range (based on current financials) between $16 and $21. Optimal purchase price: $16.45, to obtain 10% CAGR if you hold for 5 years.
Slightly overvalued at it's current price, good growth expectations at 11% should bring CSCO towards $ 29 within a few years. Suggest to wait for market pull back and re-evaluate if it hits $21.
Thank you TLassen, I will wait your feedback on other companies, Also if you can suggest any other "A" and/or "B" rated companies,It will be very helpfull. Again I appreciate your efforts.
ReplyDeleteRegards
-David
Ag. Co's:
ReplyDeleteAll companies overvalued to current earnings. Invest only if you see growth potential for this sector, it is a higher risk based on their current earnings. Having said that we are long on POT (but only because we jumped in when the stock fell back to below our fair value range, bought in at $95, not due to skill but pure luck and timing!)
POT B rating 3% return spread, Fair value range $105-120.
AGU B rating 8% return spread, fair value range $48-55
TRA B rating 17% return spread, fair value range $30-36
MOS B rating 12% return spread.Fair value range $ 50-54
In terms of current economic profit TRA amd MOS are preferable.
Risks are decrease in demand either domestic (US/Canada) or international,especially China as historically they have been the main buyer.
Verizon VZ
ReplyDeleteD rating, return spread negative and has been poor for the last 10 years. We see signs of improvement and maintain a 5 year horizon. Basically, providing the dividends don't get cut, we will hold for 5 years in anticipation of positive impact from an improved US economy (will happen!)Also, VZ is ahead of its peers, we are long only based on dividends and supported by its reasonably good cash flows. Fair value range is between $22-26
OTEX
ReplyDeleteNot familiar with this company. Just looking at numbers I don't like what I see. They return less on their invested capital than their cost of capital. It appears to have been negative for the last 5 years. Surprisingly the fair value is around it's current price. Generally speaking, when companies don't have positive economic profit, meaning they earn less than the their cost of their investment, fair values number are not of great importance. C rating. Sorry another so-so company that is difficult to put hard earned money into. I will keep this company on my watch list, as it appears the 'market' does see growth potential here.
Tellabs
ReplyDeleteC rating, Fair value between 3 and 4, cant justify any higher price than 4.80 based on current financials. Little growth expectations It is returning very little on its invested capital. Positive point: debt ratios are excellent. Actually strong balance sheet, appear to have a good cost structure.
David,
ReplyDeletehope this helps you. With every investment you are about to do, it helps to take a second and third look at these companies before committing to buying them. What is your time frame? 5 years? 10 years plus? Patience is needed when investing. Frustrating sometimes, but investors never lost any money by doing their due diligence and not jumping in without informing themselves first. If ever, you come across any advisor or fellow investor who tells you that you 'absolutely must' act now, before 'it's too late'....or any of that terminology, stay away! LOL. Been investing for more than 25 years, and have only made bad investment decisions when I acted too quickly without completely understanding the company financials or potentials
You asked for other A and B companies. Tech:
MSFT, GOOG and APPL. All overvalued currently ! MSFT wait for 20-25, APPL 140-150, GOOG 350.
Lots of value opportunities in health care. NVO, JNJ, and especially GILD. We are looking at GILD but will wait patiently for the (irrational!)market to drop them to 35-38 range before buying.
Good luck David, hope I have been of some help to you.
Hello TLassen,
ReplyDeleteThank you very much,I appreciate your help and will keep in touch.
Regards
-David